Modelo Viable del Sistema Mexicano de Innovación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54139/revinguc.v29i1.88Palabras clave:
Sistemas viables, sistemas nacionales de innovación, México, innovación tecnológicaResumen
No hay duda que, el componente tecnológico es fundamental para el crecimiento y desarrollo de los países. El uso de la teoría de la tecnología en todas sus dimensiones, tangibles o intangibles, representa una oportunidad de mejora para situaciones problemáticas como las económicas, de salud, sociales y empresariales que México presenta. Los hechos demuestran que, el desarrollo tecnológico en México ha sido insuficiente para potenciar el bienestar de su población. En este artículo, se presenta el diseño de un modelo con base en el Pensamiento Sistémico (Modelo de Sistemas Viables) y los modelos nacionales de innovación y conocimiento con la intención de ser base de la mejora de la gobernanza en México, en términos de tecnología. Mediante investigación de tipo cualitativo-descriptivo, y cuantitativo-correlacional, el modelo viable del sistema mexicano de innovación (MVSMI) propuesto, aspira a la integración de cinco sistemas y el entorno a través de la comunicación, ausente actualmente; así como, la descentralización del MVSMI y la cooperación entre las cinco hélices.
Descargas
Citas
CONACYT, “El Informe General del Estado de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación (IGECTI) 2018,” Gobierno de México, México, CDMX, Informe General, 2018.
L. Corona, “Innovación y Difusión: Un Binomio Necesario para la Competitividad,” en Políticas de Educación, Ciencia, Tecnología y Competitividad, 1era. ed., J. L. Calva, Ed. México: Consejo Nacional de Universitarios, 2012.
G. Dutrénit, M. Capdevielle, J. Corona, M. Puchet, F. Santiago, y A. Vera-Cruz, El Sistema Nacional de Innovación Mexicano: Instituciones, Políticas, Desempeño y Desafíos, 1era. ed. México: UAM-X, 2010.
Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico, Propuestas para Contribuir al Diseño del PECiTI 2012 -2037. México: FCCyT, 2013.
Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico, Diagnóstico de la Política Científica, Tecnológica y de Fomento a la Innovación en México (2000-2006). México: FCCyT, 2013.
R. K. Woolthuisa, M. Lankhuizenb, and V. Gilsing, “A System Failure Framework for Innovation Policy Design,” Technovation, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 609–619, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
R. Espejo and A. Reyes, Organizational Systems: Managing Complexity with the Viable System. Berlín, Alemania: Springer, 2014.
C. Chaminade and J. Vang, “Globalization of Knowledge Production and Regional Innovation Policy: Supporting Specialized Hubs in Developing Countries,” Research Policy, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1684– 1697, 2008.
R. Galli and M. Teubal, “Paradigmatic Shifts in National Innovation Systems,” in Systems of Innovation, Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, 1st ed., C. Edsquist, Ed. Routledge: ed UK, 2007.
R. Cozzens, S. E. / Kaplinsky, “Innovation, Poverty and Inequality: Cause, Coincidence, or Coevolution?” in Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries Building Domestic Capabilities in Global Setting, 1st ed., B.-A. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, C. Chaminade, and J. Vang, Eds. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2007.
R. J. Barro y X. Sala-i Martin, Crecimiento Económico. España: Editorial Reverté, 2009.
A. Smith, La Riqueza de las Naciones. España: Economía Alianza Editorial, 2008.
D. Ricardo, From the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, 1st ed. Dover Publications, 2004.
T. Malthus, Principios de Economía Política, 1era. ed. México: FCE, 1946.
F. Ramsey, “A Mathematical Theory of Saving,” The Economic Journal, vol. 38, no. 152, pp. 543–559, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098
A. A. Young, “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress,” The Economic Journal, vol. 38, no. 152, pp. 527–542, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224097
F. Knight, “Diminishing Returns from Investment,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 52, no. 152, pp. 26–47, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1086/256134
J. A. Schumpeter, Teoría del Desenvolvimiento Económico, 2da. ed. México: FCE, 1997.
E. Domar, “Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Economic Employment,” Econometrica, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 137–147, 1946. https://doi.org/10.2307/1905364
R. Solow, “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 65–94, 1946. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
T. Swan, “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 334–361, 1956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1956.tb00434.x
D. Cass, “Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation,” The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 1956. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295827
K. J. Arrow, “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 155–173, 1962. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295827
P. Romer, “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 1002–1037, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
R. E. Lucas, “On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 3–42, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
G. Mankiw, Macroeconomía, 6ta. ed. España: Antoni Bosch, 2006.
P. Krugman, ¡Detengamos la Crísis Ya!, 1era. ed. México: Crítica, 2012.
F. Castellacci, S. Grodal, S. Mendonca, and M. Wibe, “Advances and Challenges in Innovation Studies,” Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 91– 121, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2005.11506782
J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 1 ed. USA: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001
F. H. Maier, “New Product Diffusion Models in Innovation Management-a system dynamics perspective,” System Dynamics Review, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 285–308, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199824)14:4%3C285::AID-SDR153%3E3.0.CO;2-F
L. Corona, Innovación ante la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Disciplinas y Enfoques, 1era. ed. México: UNAM & Plaza y Valdes Editores, 2010.
Organización de Cooperación y Desarrollo Económi- co, European Commission, and Eurostat, Manual de Oslo. Guía para la Recogida e Interpretación de Datos Sobre Innovación, 3era. ed. Francia: OECD, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065659-es
R. Barras, “Towards a Theory of Innovation in Services,” Research Policy, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 161– 173, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90012-0
J. A. Sabato y N. Botana, “La Ciencia y la Tecnología en el Desarrollo Futuro de América Latina,” in El Pensamiento Latinoamericano en la Problemática Ciencia-Tecnología-Desarrollo-Dependencia, 1era. ed., J. A. Sabato, Ed. Argentina: Colección Placted-Ediciones Biblioteca Nacional, 2011.
B.-A. Lundvall, National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, 1st ed. USA: Anthem Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Managing National Innovation Systems. París: OECD, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189416-en
L. Leydesdorff and H. Etzkowitz, “Emergence of Triple Helix of University-Industry- Goverment Relations,” Science and Public Policy, vol. 23, pp. 279–286, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_452
M. E. Porter, Ser Competitivo, 1era. ed. España: Ediciones Deusto, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189416-en
B. Amable and P. Pascal, “The Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production During the 1990s,” in Nelson and Winter DRUID Summer Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, 2001.
S. Brint, “Professionals and the “Knowledge Economy”: Rethinking the Teory of Postindustrial Society,” Current Sociology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 101–132, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392101049004007
C. Edquist, Systems of Innovation for Development (SID). Investment Promotion and Institutional Capacity-Building Division/Industrial Policies and Research Branch/United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), 2001.
E. B. Viotti, “National Learning Systems: A New Approach on Technical Change in Late Industrializing Economies and Evidences from the Cases of Brazil and South Korea,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 653–680, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00167-6
M. E. P. Jeffrey, L. Furman, and S. Stern, “The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity,” Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 899–933, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4
H. Etzkowitz, “The Triple Helix of UniversityIndustry- Government Implications for Policy and Evaluation,” in Working Paper. Sister, 2001, no. 11.
E. Muller and A. Zenker, “Business Service as Actors of Knowledge Transformation: The Role of KIBS in Regional and National Innovation Systems,” Research Policy, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1501–1516, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00164-0
I. Milles, “Services Innovation: Coming of Age in the Knowledge-Based Economy,” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 371–389, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919600000202
A. Lam, “Alternative Societal Models of Learning and innovation inthe Knowledge Economy,” International Social Science Journal, vol. 54, no. 171, pp. 67–82, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00360
M. Gibbons, “Competition Processes and the Management of Innovation,” Prometheus, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 449–465, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/0810902032000144655
E. K. Graversen, S. E. K. Zidou, and L. Kamma, “Dynamic Research Environments: a development model,” International Journal Of Human Resource Management, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1498–1511, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500220754
E. G. Carayannis and D. F. J. Campbell, Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. New York: Springer, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0
E. G. Carayannis and D. F. J. Campbell, “Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Quintuple Helix and Social Ecology,” in Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, E. G. Carayannis, Ed. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_310
E. G. Carayannis, T. D. Barth, and D. F. J. Campbell, “The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation,” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 2, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
K. Ohkawa and H. Rosovsky, Japanese Economic Growth: Trend Acceleration in the Twentieth Century (Studies of Economic Growth in Industrialized Countries), 1st ed. USA: Stanford University Press, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503622746
M. Abramovitz, “Catching Uo, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind,” The Journal of Economic History, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 385–406, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700046209
W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 128–152, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
L. Kim, “Stages of Development of Industrial Technology in a Developing Country: A Model,” Research Policy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 254–277, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(80)90003-7
L. Kim, Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, 1st ed. USA: Harvard Business Review Press, 1997.
J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation USA. USA: Oxford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001
N. Wiener, Cybernetics: Or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 2nd ed. Cambridge, USA: Martino Fine Books.
W. R. Ashby, An Introduction to Cybernetics. NY, USA: Martino Fine Books, 2015.
W. B. Cannon, The Wisdom of the Body. NY, USA: W. W. Norton & Company, 1963.
S. Beer, Platform for change. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1975.
S. Beer, The heart of enterprise. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1979.
S. Beer, Brain of the firm, 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1981.
S. Beer, Diagnosing the System for Organizations. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1985.
J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. USA: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2013.
M. J. Polonsky and D. S. Waller, Designing and Managing a Research Project: A Business Student’s Guide. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, 2010.
R. E. Shannon, Simulacion de Sistemas Diseño Desarrollo e Implantación. México: Trillas, 2003.
A. A. Pacheco y M. C. Cruz, Metodología Crítica de la Investigación, 1era. ed. México: CECSA, 2006.
C. Hart, Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination, 1st ed. Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications, 2018.
J. Jesson, L. Matheson, and F. M. Lacey, Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques, 1st ed. Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications, 2011.
M. Walker, Como Escribir Trabajos de Investigación, 1st ed. CDMX, México: GEDISA Mexicana, 2007.
J. H. d. Río-Martínez y M. G. Videgaray, “¿Cómo escribir propuestas de investigación exitosas?” Rev. del Centro de Inv., vol. 10, no. 40, pp. 15–51, 2013.
R. Flood and M. Jackson, Creative Problem Solving. UK: Wiley, 1991.
M. C. Jackson, Systems Approaches to Management. Berlín, Alemania: Springer, 2000.
M. C. Jackson, Critical Systems Thinking and the Management of Complexity. Sussex, UK: Wiley, 2019.
M. Cimoli, Developing Innovation Systems: Mexico in a Global Context, 1st ed. USA: Routledge, 2005.
B.-A. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, C. Chaminade, and J. Vang, Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. Building Domestic Capabilities in Global Setting, 1st ed. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2009.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, National Innovation Systems. París: OECD, 1997.
E. J. Garrity, “Using Systems Thinking to Understand and Enlarge Mental Models: Helping the Transition to a Sustainable World,” Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 15, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6020015
M. Balzat and H. Hanusch, “Recent Trends in the Research on National Innovation Systems,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 14, pp. 197–210, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0187-y
R. R. Nelson, National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, 1st ed. USA: Oxford University Press, 1993.
M. Balzat, An Economic Analysis of Innovation: Extending the Concept of National Innovation Systems. Camberley, U. K.: Edward Elgar Pub, 2006.
H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2"to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations,” Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109– 123, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. USA: Free Press, 2003.
U. Cantner and A. Pyka, “Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective,” Research Policy, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759–775, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00104-9
J. Schmookler, Invention and Economic Growth. Bosto, USA: Harvard University Press, 1966. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674432833
T. Khalil, Management of Technology, 1st ed. USA: McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2000.
F. Betz, Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change, 3rd ed. USA: Wiley-Interscience, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470927564
J. Schumpeter, ¿Puede Sobrevivir el Capitalismo? La Destrucción Creativa y el Futuro de la Economía Global, 1era. ed. México: Capitan Swing Libros, 2010.
Cámara de Diputados de la LX Legislatura, Ley de ciencia y tecnología, H. Congreso de la Unión-Diario Oficial de la Federación, CDMX, 2002.
K. R. Popper, La lógica de la investigación científica. España: Tecnos, 2009.
B. Mandelbrot, La Geometría Fractal de la Naturaleza. España: Tusquets Editor, 2002.
P. Hoverstadt, The Fractal Organization: Creating Sustainable Organizations with the Viable System Model. Nueva Jersey, Estados Unidos:: Wiley, 2009.
S. Beer, Beyond Dispute: The Invention of Team Syntegrity. Nueva Jersey, Estados Unidos: Wiley, 1994.
A. Espinosa and J. Walker, Complexity Approach to Sustainability, A: Theory and Application. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1142/q0060
A. Espinosa and J. Walker, “Complexity management in practice: A Viable System Model intervention in an Irish eco-community,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 225, no. 40, pp. 118–129, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.015
G. M. Jenkins and P. V. Youle, “A Systems Approach to Management,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–21, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1968.3
S. Beer, “The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology,” The Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 7–25, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1984.2
R. Espejo, “Observing organisations: the use of identity and structural archetypes,” International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, vol. 2, p. 6, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASS.2008.022791
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Ingeniería UC
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
